Legal Opinion · Dissent

Govan v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2004Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), which entered a $50,000 judgment against the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA) in the negligence lawsuit filed by Latif Wheeler Govan (Govan), through his parents, for injuries that he sustained as a result of a pit bull dog attack on PHA’s premises. Govan alleged several theories of negligence, including a failure to control a dog secured on PHA’s premises, a failure to adhere to its duties under a pet policy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Herman v. Greene County Fair BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API