Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided November 18, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle B. Roberts, Judge.

Plaintiff appealed from defendant’s Order No. IH 74-8, dated October 22, 1974, which affirmed the assessment of a deficiency of $7,992.75 plus accrued interest on plaintiff’s inheritance tax return.

The sole issue in the case is: For purposes of the Oregon inheritance tax, what is the “true cash value” of the release or forgiveness of a debt in a will?

Defendant argued that since Oregon imposes an inheritance tax, which is a tax on the right to receive property of a decedent, “true cash value” should be the value of the thing the beneficiary received and, since the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. MacOmberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Poulsen v. HoffOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dept. of Revenue v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Pedersen v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gearhart's Ex'r and Ex'x v. Howard, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API