Vansant v. Hartman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Claypool, J., entered December 31, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to determine the title to real property, tried to the court. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
In this action the plaintiff claims to be the owner of lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, in block 16 of Edes & Knight’s addition to the town (now city) of Seattle, by virtue of the foreclosure of a mortgage upon a leasehold interest therein. The defendants Hartman and wife claim to be the owners of the property, subject to the payment of the purchase price thereof to them by Mr. Martin; and Martin and wife claim to be the owners, subject to the payment of $25,000 to Hartman. Upon a trial of the case, the trial court entered a decree adjudging the plaintiff to be the owner of the property upon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nichols v. CapenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hallidie Co. v. Washington Brick, Lime & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MavrikasWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Vansant v. HartmanWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- In re Appeal of City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1915