Vansant v. Hartman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Claypool, J., entered December 31, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to determine the title to real property, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition tor Reheaeing.
2Per curiam
The respondent petitions this court for a modification of the opinion filed herein, 88 Wash. 636, 153 Pac. 1062. The *691appellants have filed a petition for a rehearing, arguing, in substance, that the original lease has been terminated because of failure to pay rent.
We think the original opinion is clear; but in order to avoid confusion or misconstruction of the opinion, we may say that it was our intention to hold that the plaintiff, Yansant, is entitled to all the rights of the original lessee under the lease and liable to perform the lease as the original lessee;…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Vansant v. HartmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
4Cited by3 opinions
- Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Randa v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970