Legal Opinion

Bayne v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1929No. A-6435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of having possession of a still and worm so made and assembled as to be capable of making and manufacturing whisky.

The information properly charges that the defendants did, in Lincoln county, wilfully, unlawfully, and wrongfully, have possession of a still and worm, an appliance made and set for the manufacture of whisky, and said still being so made and assembled as to be capable of making and manufacturing whisky.

The only evidence offered in this case against the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. Ogden, District JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Bayne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API