Atwood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of having possession of mash fit for distillation and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.
The facts in the case, as revealed by the evidence of the state, are that one W. D. Shamblin, deputy sheriff, visited the premises of the defendant for the purpose of serving a summons on the sister of the defendant; that while on the premises he smelled a strong odor of whisky mash, and later in the day made affidavit and procured a search warrant to search the premises of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shockley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Whitford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bayne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Herron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. LittletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968