Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 2001No. 4-01-0037 WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Respondent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), appeals from the order of the trial court confirming the decision of the Industrial Commission (Commission) wherein claimant, Heather Parry, was awarded temporary total disability benefits, permanency benefits, and payment of medical bills. Parry cross-appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to dismiss.

On November 11, 1995, Parry was employed by Wal-Mart and was scheduled to work a 4:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift. Parry left the store at 8:30 p.m. for her meal break. She did not return that night; instead, she called the store from her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Deichmueller Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Residential Carpentry, Inc. v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Mores-Harvey v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Twice Over Clean, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Freesen, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Twice Over Clean, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API