Legal Opinion

Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 12, 1994No. 1-93-2970WCPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Claimant, John J. Prendergast, Jr., sought benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) for injuries to his back allegedly sustained on April 2, 1987, while working for Nabisco Brands, Inc., employer. The arbitrator concluded claimant had proved his injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment and, accordingly, awarded him temporary total disability benefits for a period of 20s/? weeks and medical and surgical expenses totalling approximately $13,758. On review, the Industrial Commission (Commission) reversed the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Board of Trustees v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Stapleton v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Homerding v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Koehler Electric v. WillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API