Legal Opinion

Andrulonis v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided October 3, 1984No. 79-CV-847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUNSON, Chief Judge.

The defendant United States has renewed its Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss or for summary judgment under Rule 56 following the recent decision by the Supreme Court on the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) (1982), [FTCA], United States v. S.A. Empresa DeViacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2755, 81 L.Ed.2d 660 (1984), \Varig\ The Government’s previous motion to dismiss was denied on December 19, 1983. After careful review of the parties’ memoranda and after oral arguments on the motion, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Patrick v. LeFevreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrulonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  2. Maalouf v. Swiss ConfederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Eisenberg v. Peoples Republic of ChinaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API