Legal Opinion

Calabrian Chemicals Corp. v. Bailey-Buchanan Masonry, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 10, 2001No. 09-00-373 CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GAULTNEY, Justice.

Appellee Bailey-Buchanan Masonry, Inc. (“Bailey”) sued appellant Calabrian Chemicals Corporation (“Calabrian”) to recover damages under a building contract and to foreclose on a mechanic’s lien. The jury found that Calabrian did not comply with its agreement with Bailey, but nonetheless returned a verdict of zero damages. After both Bailey and Calabrian filed post-verdict motions, the trial court granted Bailey’s motion to disregard the jury findings of $0 for both damages and attorney’s fees and, in effect, denied Calabrian’s motion to enter judgment on the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Triplex Communications, Inc. v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Huber v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. ShirzadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Puckett v. ArvizuCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. James M. Maddox and Kelli L. Maddox v. Summit Mortgage Corporation and Nationsbanc Mortgage Corporation, Now Known as Bank of America Mortgage Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API