M.S. v. Pa. State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUDGE BROBSON
Petitioner M.S. filed a petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus and for declaratory relief (Petition) against the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP), relating to PSP's designation of Petitioner as a sex offender under Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA),1 which has now been replaced by SORNA II. Before the *1144Court is Petitioner's application for summary relief (Application), through which Petitioner seeks an order: (1) declaring that the application of SORNA registration requirements to him violates his state and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.L. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- C. J. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Martinez-Olacio, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- M.S. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022