Legal Opinion

M.S. v. Pa. State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2019No. 335 M.D. 2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUDGE BROBSON

Petitioner M.S. filed a petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus and for declaratory relief (Petition) against the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP), relating to PSP's designation of Petitioner as a sex offender under Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA),1 which has now been replaced by SORNA II. Before the *1144Court is Petitioner's application for summary relief (Application), through which Petitioner seeks an order: (1) declaring that the application of SORNA registration requirements to him violates his state and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A.L. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. C. J. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Martinez-Olacio, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. M.S. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API