State v. Hollis
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VandeWalle, Chief Justice.
*173[¶1] Alexander Hollis appealed from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence, which we treat as an appeal from the subsequently entered criminal judgment. Hollis argues the evidence should be suppressed because he was subject to an illegal pat-down search and he was illegally seized when he was taken to the county detention center for detoxification. We affirm the judgment.
I
[¶2] In April 2018, Bismarck Police Officer Michael Mehrer responded to a call about a loud verbal dispute between a man and a woman in the area of Washington Court. When Mehrer arrived at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Michael Deshawne Glenn, Also Known as George LoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- State v. PhelpsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FrieszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Jamestown v. ErdeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. BeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021