Legal Opinion

Streff v. Colteaux

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1896Published

Assumpsit, for commissions, etc.—Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge presiding.

1OpinionJustice Waterman

on beheaeing.

In a petition for rehearing, counsel urge that it is error to permit a default to be taken on a pleading to which an interposed demurrer remains undisposed of. The abstract filed by the same counsel shows that on October 29, 1895, the demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration was overruled; this was to the amended declaration, to which Mathias P. Streff demurred, being the only declaration then in the case and on which default was entered November 7, 1895.

There is a plain distinction between actions on executory contracts and actions on contracts fully performed, so that nothing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elder v. HoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Tunnison v. FieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Pickard & Munger v. Bates & TowsleeIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Kellogg v. McClellanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API