Legal Opinion

Pickard & Munger v. Bates & Towslee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Bates & Towslee against the appellants, to recover the value of certain professional services. The jury gave the plaintiffs a verdict for nine hundred and seventy-five dollars. The first objection taken by the counsel for the appellants is founded upon the admission of the deposition of Hooper, it being urged that he was a resident of Chicago, and that no affidavit was filed as required by the statute. It is sufficient to say, on this point, that the deposition was taken by the written consent of the counsel for the appellants.

It is further urged…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gottschalk v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  2. Rubens v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Deuterman v. RuppelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. Harman Coal Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Streff v. ColteauxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API