Legal Opinion

Ernest William Davis, Etc. v. Pyrofax Gas Corporation, Etc., and Goss, Inc., Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1986No. 83-3715PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Florida Supreme Court has answered in the affirmative the question certified by us to that court in this case. For our question and attendant opinion, see 753 F.2d 928 (11th Cir.1985). For the answer by the Supreme Court of Florida and its attendant opinion, see 492 So.2d 1044 (Fla.1986).

The decision by the Florida Supreme Court disposes of the issue of jurisdiction over the two defendants in this case. The second issue on appeal related to the matter of the district court’s dismissal of the complaint for insufficient service of process. That order should have quashed the service of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mr. And Mrs. A. T. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Ralph E. Vorhees, to His Own Use and to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Nancy Vorhees, His Wife v. Fischer & KreckeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Jim Fox Enterprises, Inc. v. Air FranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Davis v. Pyrofax Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Ernest William Davis, Etc. v. Pyrofax Gas Corporation, Etc., and Goss, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A.I.M. International, Inc. v. Battenfeld Extrusions Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API