Schultz v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
McHUGH, Judge:
¶ 1 Rory J. Schultz appeals from a court order ruling that Schultz’s attorney did not render ineffective assistance when he advised Schultz, who is mentally impaired, of his appellate rights but did not thereafter contact Schultz to reconfirm his decision not to appeal. We affirm.
¶ 2 Schultz’s mental impairment makes it difficult for him to remember things. Schultz, however, was found competent to proceed to trial by a courCordered competency evaluation.
¶ 3 Schultz pleaded guilty to four reduced counts of sexual abuse of a child. See Utah Code Ann. §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Manning v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BenvenutoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Jacobs v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. VosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007