Legal Opinion

Colonial Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1978No. Nos. 76-2079, 76-2080 and 76-2083PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant failed to object or except to the giving of the Allen instruction. Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492,17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). Our examination of the record convinces us that appellant is in no position to raise the question at this time. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Apellant’s other contentions: (1) that the judge abused his discretion in failing to interrogate the potential jurors in accordance with her requests, (2) that the government failed to comply with the discovery requirements of Rule 16, F.R.Crim.P., and (3) that the government’s failure to disclose…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michael T. Gage v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Ronald Mayer and Mike Gage Chevrolet, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Colonial Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. North Broadway Motors, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  4. Sink v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. Wright-Moore Corp. v. Ricoh Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API