Legal Opinion
Sink v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 7, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-70008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
This cause of action, arising chiefly under the Dealer’s Day in Court Act (DDCA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1221-1225 is before this Court on defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing plaintiff Sink Ford, Inc.’s three count complaint. Plaintiff seeks recovery under the DDCA, Count I, under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Count II, and under Michigan’s common-law of misrepresentation, Count III. Both Counts II and III are before the Court only because of pendent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,655 J. Scott Campbell v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hubbard Chevrolet Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987
- Hugh Chalmers Motors, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S. A., Inc. Gulf States Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.