Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Manistee Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1908No. Calendar No. 23,121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus by Harry Goldman to compel Charles H. Rose, circuit judge of Manistee county, to dissolve an injunction, and to vacate an order appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Application for mandamus. The writ is sought to require the respondent to dissolve a preliminary injunction and vacate an order appointing a receiver.

One William Imerman and the relator were in business as copartners under the trade-name of the Western Hide & Fur Company of Manistee for some time prior to the 29th day of September, 1908. Upon that day Imerman filed a bill in chancery and his own affidavit, and upon the filing thereof applied for a temporary injunction against Goldman and for the appointment of a receiver. The circuit judge ex parte made an order appointing a receiver for all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. Judge of St. Clair CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Salling v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Hall v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McCombs v. MerryhewMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Comstock v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuller v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Woodmansee v. Ann Arbor Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Carpenter v. LandmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McQuater v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API