Legal Opinion

Salling v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1872PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Manistee Circuit. Motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the order appealed from, is not a final one.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order appointing a receiver, on the ground that it is not final.

The order can only be understood by referring briefly to the nature of the controversy.

*490The complainant sets up, in his bill, the former existence and dissolution of a partnership with one J. A. Johnson, on which dissolution the goods and some other property were absolutely assigned, without condition, to J. A. Johnson; certain other assets divided between the partners; certain further assets to be collected for joint benefit; and Johnson was to pay debts, account -for a share of the…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. Judge of St. Clair CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Savage v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API