Legal Opinion
United States v. McIntyre
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided November 14, 1991No. 4:90-cv-70047PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, RULING GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
VIETOR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America brings suit against defendant William McIntyre to enforce a civil money penalty assessed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursuant to section 2[18](j)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1828(j)(4). Plaintiff moves for summary judgment, and defendant resists asserting a statute of limitations defense. The motion is submitted.
Summary Judgment Standard
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. City of Columbia, Missouri Harold Boldt, Finance DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Cheryl C. Godbout-Bandal Bruce A. Rasmussen Wayne Field Richard D. DonohooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Great American Veal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re DonohooUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. Richard D. DonohooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000