Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peter Barceloux Co. v. Buffum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1932No. 6400Published

1Dissent

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

Many of the assignments and specifications have not been prepared in accordance with the rules of this eourt. Repeatedly there has been failure to “quote the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected” to enable one to make an intelligent ruling without having recourse to the transcript and even to the exhibits. While a federal court would be technically justified in disregarding such faulty assignments and specifications altogether, I have preferred to waive formal defects and considered all the specifications except one.

On the other hand, the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. New Hampshire v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Security Warehousing Co. v. HandSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API