Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Keystone Auto Sales

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 16, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00050Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SCOTTSDALE SURPLUS LINES ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) CASE NO. 1:19CV0050 ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON v. ) ) KEYSTONE AUTO SALES, et al., ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendants. ) [Resolving ECF No. 26] Pending is Plaintiff Scottsdale Surplus Line Insurance Company’s (“Scottsdale”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26), filed on June 11, 2019. On July 16, 2019, the Yoder Family1 filed a Notice (ECF No. 29) that they do not intend to submit a memorandum in opposition to the motion. The Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API