Legal Opinion
Faulkner v. Pezeshki
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1975No. 963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCray, J.
Plaintiffs, the appellees, filed a complaint charging defendant with malpractice. A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant filed his notice of appeal alleging the following errors:
“(1) The Trial Court erred in permitting the testi mony of Dr. Michael Stryker and Dr. James Hardy as to malpractice.
“ (2) The Trial Court erred in charging upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and ordinary care, when the same was not pleaded nor applicable.
“(3) The Trial Court erred in permitting the jury to consider whether the defendant had instructed the plaintiff as to post-operative care.
“…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Webb v. JornsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Pollard v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.