Pollard v. Goldsmith
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Acting Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a medical malpractice action. The issue is whether the plaintiffs’ response to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment showed that they would be able to offer evidence at trial establishing the applicable standard of care, and thereby created a genuine issue as to a material fact precluding summary judgment. We hold that the response was sufficient to establish a fact issue and that summary judgment was inappropriate in this case.
On May 17,1969, Mary McKibben…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Kronke v. DanielsonArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Evans v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Abernethy v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- McGuire v. DeFrancescoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990