State v. Rothering
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of evidence for kidnapping and criminal sexual assault convictions. He also contends the trial court made several errors in admitting and excluding evidence and in refusing an instruction permitting conviction for fornication,, a misdemeanor. We find no merit in the appeal.
FACTS
In the middle of the night on August 5, 1985, A.P. was asleep in her farm home near Fremont, Minnesota. She lived with her fiance, but he was out of town at the time.
A.P. testified at trial that she was awakened by the sound of a car pulling into her driveway.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.