Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Town of Litchfield

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 14, 1985No. 2168; 2169; 2170; 2171; 2172; 2173; 2174; 2175; 2176; 2177PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dupont, C.P.J.

These cases concern ten appeals1 from judgments of the trial court which reduced the sewer assessments of ten property owners.2 Each plaintiff is a property owner in the town of Litchfield. The town assessed benefits arising from the construction of a sewer, pursuant to General Statutes § 7-249. After trial, the court, Stoughton, J., determined that it was impossible either to confirm or alter the assessments without additional evidence, and ordered the cases back on the trial list in order that additional evidence might be offered by any party. A second trial court, Sullivan,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Spiniello Construction Co. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Faith Center, Inc. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Katz v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Schult v. SchultConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Stiefel v. LindemannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API