Legal Opinion

In Re Gaydos

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 30, 2010No. 19-10631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is currently before the Court on the trustee’s objection to the debtors’ claim of exemptions. On September 14, 2010, the Court heard argument on the trustee’s objection and the debtors’ response. The parties were given an opportunity to file supplemental briefs by September 30, 2010, and then the Court took the matter under advisement. Neither party chose to file a supplemental brief. At issue is whether the debtors can exempt $2,175 in equity in a Peterbilt Cab as a “tool of the trade” under Ohio Revised Code §…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Daugherty v. Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. In the Matter of Ronald and Marjorie Patterson, Debtors. Appeal of Abbotsford State BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Orange County's Credit Union (In Re Garcia)District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. In re GilicaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  3. Kelli Denise Allen and Paul Eugene AllenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API