Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 7, 1927No. 350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, J.

For a statement of the nature of this case reference is made to an opinion by the Fort Worth court on a former appeal in Lancaster v. Crockett, 271 S. W. 307. After the case was remanded in accordance with that opinion, the plaintiff amended his petition, embodying therein the additional allegations, in substance, that it was the establishd rule and custom that no ear standing on the team track where appel-lee was injured should be moved, and no car switched or run on said track, without first notifying persons engaged in the work of unloading a car on that track; that the a.gents and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Decatur Cotton Seed Oil Co. v. BelewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. DouglasTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. St. Martin v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Ft. Worth Belt Ry. Co. v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Lancaster v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Utilities Co. v. DearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Grocers Supply Co. v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company v. CadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. TerrellDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API