Legal Opinion

Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. Douglas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1889No. 2619PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Aransas. Tried below before Hon. H. Clay Pleasants. This is the third appeal in this case. 63 Texas, 564, and 69 Texas, 694.

1Opinion of the Court

Hobby, Judge.—

This is an appeal from a judgment recovered by the appellee against the appellant in the sum of $12,000 for compensatory damages, resulting from personal injuries received by the former while in the employment óf appellant.

The circumstances under which the appellee was injured were as follows: He was a plumber by trade, and was employed by appellant to work in the line of his trade, and when not so engaged he was to make himself generally useful about the shops of the company. He was under the direction and control of the master mechanic of the appellant, Sutcliffe. On the 1st…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. StalcupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Howard Oil Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. McCarty v. GappelbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Allen v. RiedelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API