Legal Opinion

Burling v. Stinnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1915No. 4352PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Woodward County; Clyde H. Wyand, Judge. Action by E. Burling against R. Stinnett. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DUDLEY, C.

On January 20, 1911, tbe plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, commenced this action in the justice court of Woodward township, Woodward county, before B. B. Smith, justice of the peace therein, against the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, to recover the amount claimed to be due upon a promissory note of $160, executed by the defendant on November 5, 1909, due and payable to the order of plaintiff one year thereafter, bearing interest at 10 per cent, from maturity. A copy of the note was attached to the bill of particulars. On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Street v. Missouri-Interstate Paper Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Schott v. Glen-Dial, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API