Legal Opinion
Burtman v. Garland
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 28, 2024No. 4:24-cv-00144Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Svetlana Burtman, No. CV-24-00144-TUC-SHR 10 Plaintiff, Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order 11 v. 12 Merrick Garland, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO 17 Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Svetlana Burtman pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 65. (Doc. 2.) Defendants filed a Response. (Doc. 10.) For the reasons stated below, the 19 Court denies the TRO Motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff is a nurse practitioner who owns and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.