Legal Opinion
ALLARIE v. Donnelly
District Court, D. Maine
Decided April 8, 2003No. CIV.02-162-P-DMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Patrick Donnelly moves for summary judgment as to Count II of plaintiff Michael Allarie’s two-count complaint on grounds that the tort it alleges — wanton misconduct — is not recognized in the State of Maine and, alternatively, the facts cannot support a finding of liability thereunder. See Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (Docket No. 25); Complaint, attached to Notice of Removal (Docket No. 1). For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted.
I.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- McCrory v. Spigel (In Re Spigel)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Client Solutions Architects, LLC v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Cruz M. Mendez Garcia v. Rushmore Loan Management Services as Service Agent of Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- In re: Chase Monarch International Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2018
- In re: Rafael Fernandez QuesadaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- OGuinn v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021