Legal Opinion
Brendsel v. WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 10, 2006No. 66, September Term, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
898 A.2d 472 (2006)
392 Md. 601
Leland BRENDSEL, et al.
v.
WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
No. 66, September Term, 2005.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
May 10, 2006.
Lawrence S. Greenwald (Lawrence P. Fletcher-Hill and Catherine A. Bledsoe of Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, LLC, Baltimore), on brief, for petitioners.
Robert M. Wright (William P. Pearce of Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore), on brief, for respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, and GREENE, JJ.
WILNER, J.
We shall resolve here the dilemma faced by a contractor who (1)…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Kenneth Dale Bradley, Samuel L. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.