Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1922No. 7114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for drunkenness in a public place.

Our Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. He calls attention to the fact that the caption to the transcript fails to show the date of adjournment of the term of court at which the conviction was had. Under the authority of Mandosa v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 84, 225 S. W. Rep., 169; Davis v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 183, 225 S. W. Rep., 532; Williams v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 115, 237 S. W. Rep., 920, this should appear. The reasons' are apparent from the cases cited.

We would also call…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Mandosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Mandosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Cervantes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API