Legal Opinion

Mandosa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1920No. 5882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Correction of Transcript.

MORROW, J.

This is. an appea-l from judgment of the county court adjudging appellant guilty of a misdemeanor. The record is not in condition to authorize its consideration, for the reason that the caption fails to disclose the date upon which the term at which the case was tried terminated. The statute limiting the time within which bills of exceptions and statement of facts may be filed renders knowledge of the date of adjournment necessary, in order that the appellate court may know whether the statute has been complied with, with reference to the bills of exceptions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Greenwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Pool v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. State v. BeetsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API