Legal Opinion

Connelly v. Richmond

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1928No. 11,357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

This is a suit by a real estate agent for a commission.

In the first paragraph of his petition he alleges that “he is a licensed and bonded real estate broker of this city.” Defendant in her answer denies for want of information “the facts set out in the first paragraph of plaintiff’s demand.”

There is no proof in the record that plaintiff is licensed or bonded and we are asked to dismiss his suit in conformity with Section 19 of Act 236 of 1920, reading as follows:

“Be it further enacted, etc., That any persop, firm, co-partnership, association or corporation, who has not been licensed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broussard v. RosenblumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. BurdineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Matthews-Pelton, Inc. v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API