Legal Opinion

DeMary v. Latrobe Printing & Publishing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 2000PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Louis DeMary and Dorothy DeMary [hereinafter collectively referred to as “the DeMarys”] appeal from the order sustaining preliminary objections filed by Latrobe Printing and Publishing, Inc., t/d/b/a/ the Latrobe Bulletin, Thomas Whiteman, Marie McCandless, and Jeanette Wolf [hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Bulletin”] to the DeMarys’ twelve count amended complaint. The DeMarys argue that their amended complaint was sufficient to withstand the Bulletin’s demurrers. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

¶ 2 On February 20, 1998, the DeMarys commenced an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Alfred R. Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Richard KellmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Donahue v. Federal Express Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Lux v. Gerald E. Ort Trucking, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Brian McCafferty v. Newsweek Media Group LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Weber v. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Glenn R. Funk v. Scripps Media, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API