DeMary v. Latrobe Printing & Publishing Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 Louis DeMary and Dorothy DeMary [hereinafter collectively referred to as “the DeMarys”] appeal from the order sustaining preliminary objections filed by Latrobe Printing and Publishing, Inc., t/d/b/a/ the Latrobe Bulletin, Thomas Whiteman, Marie McCandless, and Jeanette Wolf [hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Bulletin”] to the DeMarys’ twelve count amended complaint. The DeMarys argue that their amended complaint was sufficient to withstand the Bulletin’s demurrers. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
¶ 2 On February 20, 1998, the DeMarys commenced an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alfred R. Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Richard KellmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Donahue v. Federal Express Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Lux v. Gerald E. Ort Trucking, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Brian McCafferty v. Newsweek Media Group LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Weber v. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Glenn R. Funk v. Scripps Media, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.