Legal Opinion

Chess v. Pieper

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 27, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00466Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Markiquse Chess, Case No. 2:24-cv-00466-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff Order Granting Motion to Remand 6 v. [ECF No. 15] 7 Troy Gardiner Pieper, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 This motion to remand arises out of the alleged injury of plaintiff Markiquse Chess. 11 Chess argues this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction because he was a resident of 12 New York, and not New Jersey, at the time of filing suit against New York-based defendants 13 Troy Gardiner Pieper and Pieper New York-Multistate Bar Review, LTD. (collectively, “Pieper”). 14 Chess…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API