Flint v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Bill in Chancery. Heard on the pleadings and a special master’s report, September Term, 1885, Windham County, Walkeii, Chancellor. Ordered proforma and without a hearing that the additional bill be dismissed. The 4th article of the agreement was : “4th. The stipulated value of the said Johnson and Babbitt’s four-sixteenths of the property of said firm, not including debts due said firm, is hereby understood and agreed to be four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500). Said.
Read the full summary
Bill in Chancery. Heard on the pleadings and a special master’s report, September Term, 1885, Windham County, Walkeii, Chancellor. Ordered proforma and without a hearing that the additional bill be dismissed. The 4th article of the agreement was : “4th. The stipulated value of the said Johnson and Babbitt’s four-sixteenths of the property of said firm, not including debts due said firm, is hereby understood and agreed to be four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500). Said. W. and J. Gr. Flint hereby aeree to pay and assume for the said Johnson and Babbitt $4,500 of the indebtedness of said…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was- delivered by
Royce, C. J.
The original bill was brought to procure the dissolution of a copartnership that then subsisted between the parties to the suit, for the appointment of a receiver, and for the taking an account of what was due said firm from each member thereof, and what was due to each mem-*196her of said firm, and for an injunction against the defendant Johnson.
After the defendant Johnson’s answer had been filed, and while the cause was pending, on the first day of July, 1878, the orators Wyman Flint and John G. Flint, .and the defendants, Johnson and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co. v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Colvocoresses v. W. S. Wasserman Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Locklin v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
- Varnum v. Village of MorrisvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Mussey v. BatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888