Brew-Woltman & Co. v. National Power Machinery Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MORGAN, J.
The plaintiff filed its action in the Municipal Court of Cleveland to recover a balance of $1350.00 alleged to be due on a contract of sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of certain power machinery located in Sherman, Texas. The defendant counter-claimed for $450.00, .being the amount of the partial payment by the defendant to the plaintiff for said machinery. Defendant’s counter-claim was based on allegations that the plaintiff, through its agent, misrepresented the condition and quality of the said power machinery and that there was, in fact, no contract of sale…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duggan v. Matthew Cummings Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Wagner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Hamilton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- E. T. Barnum Iron Works v. Prescott Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. ChodosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Filice v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008