Legal Opinion

Jack v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 10, 2002No. 01-00-00953-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On March 13, 2001, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the cause “for a hearing to determine whether appellant had counsel, and whether he received effective assistance of counsel, during the 30 day period for filing a motion for new trial.” Jack v. State, 42 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, order). Pending the outcome of that hearing, we delayed ruling on appellant’s request for a remand to enable him to file an out-of-time motion for new trial. See id.

On April 20, 2001, the trial judge held that hearing, finding as follows:

I

FINDINGS OF FACT

[[Image here]]

2.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Benson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Cooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Sossamon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  5. Guidry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API