Legal Opinion

Mendocino Community Health Clinic v. State Department of Health Care Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 2013No. C067826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the State Department of Health Care Services (Department), which administers Medi-Cal, may limit payment to federally qualified health centers (FQHC’s) for psychological services to two visits per month per patient. The Department concluded that it can, but the trial court granted the petition of Mendocino Community Health Clinic and other related clinics (the Mendocino Clinics), which are FQHC’s, for a writ requiring payment beyond the two-visit limit. We conclude that the petition was improperly granted. Federal law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. American Coatings Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cowan v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Three Lower Counties Community Health Services, Inc. v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. California Ass'n of Rural Health Clinics v. Maxwell-JollyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arizona Alliance For Community Health Centers v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API