Legal Opinion

Lindenbaum v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1945No. L. A. 19177Published

1Opinion of the Court

26 Cal.2d 565 (1945)

ISIDORE LINDENBAUM, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

L. A. No. 19177.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 22, 1945.

Isaac Pacht and Harry J. Miller for Petitioner.

Paul Nourse and Clarence B. Runkle for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioner be suspended for the period of six months.

Petitioner was charged with the violation of his oath and duties as an attorney and the commission of acts involving moral turpitude within the meaning of sections 6103 and 6106 of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jacobs v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API