Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. PRO 56
COLLINS, District Judge.
Trying to protect what he claims is his exclusive right to make or present videos or television specials in which the secrets behind well-known magic tricks or illusions are revealed, Plaintiff has sued everyone associated with making and presenting a series of allegedly infringing television specials. Most of the remaining Defendants have now filed two summary judgment motions: (1) for Summary Adjudication Re: Plaintiffs Copyright Claims (“Copyright Motion”); and (2) for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Idema v. Dreamworks, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Williams v. GayeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Swirsky v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Swirsky v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.