Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schaeffer v. Poellnitz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 2014No. 1110353Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Chief Justice

I concur fully with the main opinion. I write specially to point out that even were the plaintiffs — the Young branch — entitled to a judgment in their favor on the mismanagement-of-trust claim, the punitive-damages award would still be subject to reversal.

I. The jury’s failure to apportion punitive damages

Because an appellate court reviews a punitive-damages award de novo, no deference is given to a judgment imposing such an award.

“(a) On appeal, no presumption of correctness shall apply to the amount of punitive damages awarded.
“(b) The appellate court shall independently reassess the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Meighan v. Birmingham Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Phillip D. Ellis and Marilyn N. Ellis v. Richard Zuck, Wilma Zuck Aulsbrook, as Administratrix of the Estate of Gordon D. Zuck, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API