Legal Opinion · Concurrence

County of Los Angeles v. Soto

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984No. L.A. 31678Published

1ConcurrenceRichardson, J.

I concur with the majority opinion to the extent that it reverses the order vacating the 1978 judgment of paternity. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s holding that defendant may collaterally attack that judgment. In my view, we should conclusively presume the validity of the 1978 judgment.

A cognovit clause, or confession of judgment, is a device by which a debtor consents in advance to a judgment entered without notice and a hearing. (D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Frick Co. (1972) 405 U.S. 174, 176 [31 L.Ed.2d 124, 128, 92 S.Ct. 775].) While the United States Supreme Court has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Salas v. CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Isbell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. County of Ventura v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API