Muth v. Fleming
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
The defendants propounded a total of eight interrogatories to the plaintiffs, three of which have been answered. The plaintiffs refused to answer the last five, although the answers to the first three have the effect to supply an answer, in part at least, to interrogatory 5. For instance, in that interrogatory the defendants sought information as to who was driving the truck at the time of the accident. By answer to interrogatory 2, the plaintiffs said: “The names of all of the occupants of said truck at the time of said collision were Wayne Linninger, * * * who was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.