Legal Opinion

Koontz v. Mylius

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by Koontz, Phillips & Stamm, partners, etc., against Charles E. Mylius and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Pkesident:

Jacob Koontz,, E. F. Phillips and John Stamm, partners trading as Koontz, Phillips & Stamm, recovered a judgment against Charles E. Mylius in an action of trespass for the cutting and removing of timber from land claimed by them, and defendant brings error. The alleged trespass was committed by defendant’s vendee, the Demp-Bell Lumber Company, a corporation, which was sued jointly with Mylius. It was not served with process, and judgment was recovered against Mylius only., Numerous errors are assigned. The one chiefly relied on is the rejection of defendant’s special pleas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. DunlevieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. StoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Mylius v. KoontzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TriplettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Watson v. Buckhannon River Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lehman v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. HankishWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API