Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dunbar

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 2014No. Docket No. 314877Published

1DissentMeter, P.J.

For the reasons set forth below, I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence.

This case arises out of a traffic stop of defendant’s vehicle. On October 12, 2012, at approximately 1:00 a.m., deputies of the Muskegon County Sherriff s Department stopped defendant’s truck on the basis of an obstructed license plate. After stopping defendant’s vehicle, deputies found cocaine, marijuana, and a handgun.

Defendant argues that the deputies did not have a lawful basis for stopping his truck and that his motion to suppress should have been granted. “A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. People v. ChapoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. HydeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. FarrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API